The Effect Of Neck Position On Intraocular Presurre In Healthy Adults : A Cross – Sectional Study
Main Article Content
Keywords
intraocular pressure, neck position, flexion, extension, tonometry, clinical optometry
Abstract
Introduction: Intraocular pressure (IOP) is an important parameter in eye health evaluation, particularly in the detection and management of glaucoma. Variations in body position, including neck position, are suspected to influence IOP values and potentially cause bias in clinical measurements. This study aimed to assess differences in intraocular pressure in three neck positions: neutral (normal), flexion, and extension.
Methods: This study used a cross-sectional study design involving 39 healthy young subjects with a mean age of 23.53 ± 2.17 years and a mean spherical equivalent (SER) of 0.91 ± 1.03 diopters. IOP measurements were performed three times in each eye using the TonoPen AVIA (Reichert Inc., Depew, New York, USA) in the normal neck position, after 5 minutes of neck flexion, and after 5 minutes of neck extension.
Results: showed that the average IOP in the normal neck position was 13.66 ± 1.88 mmHg, increasing to 17.24 ± 1.94 mmHg in the flexed position, and 14.66 ± 2.28 mmHg in the extended position. Repeated-measures ANOVA analysis showed a significant difference between the three positions (F (1.81; 67.01) = 94.46; p < 0.01). Bonferroni's further test confirmed that the IOP in the flexed position was significantly higher than in the normal and extended positions.
Conclusion: this study shows that neck position significantly influences intraocular pressure, with the lowest value in the neutral position. Therefore, in clinical practice, neck position should be standardized when measuring IOP to avoid misinterpretation of results.
References
Bill A. Blood circulation and fluid dynamics in the eye. Physiol Rev. 1975;55(3):383–417. doi:10.1152/physrev.1975.55.3.383
Caprioli J, Coleman AL. Intraocular pressure fluctuation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(4):609–612. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.10.031
Costa VP, et al. Ocular perfusion pressure and glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(4):343–350. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02492.x
Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 4th ed. London: Sage Publications; 2013.
Jonas JB, et al. Glaucoma. Lancet. 2017;390(10108):2183–2193. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31469-1
Kanski JJ, Bowling B. Clinical ophthalmology: a systematic approach. 8th ed. London: Elsevier; 2016.
Kotecha A. Tonometry and intraocular pressure measurements. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(4):513–517. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.085639
Leske MC. Open-angle glaucoma epidemiology. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(2):196–201. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.10.054
Liu JHK, Weinreb RN. Monitor intraocular pressure for 24 h. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(5):599–600. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.085191
Malihi M, Sit AJ. Effect of body position on intraocular pressure. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(5):987–991. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.10.024
Medeiros FA, et al. Predicting progression in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(3):593–601. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.10.003
Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
Razeghinejad MR, Myers JS. Contemporary approaches to glaucoma. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2018;13(2):117–128. doi:10.4103/jovr.jovr_96_18
Sit AJ, Liu JH. Pathophysiology of intraocular pressure. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20(2):84–89. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283252c3b
Sugiyono. Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2018.
Turner DC, et al. Standardization of IOP measurements. J Glaucoma. 2021;30(2):145–152. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001712
Wang Y. Episcleral venous pressure and IOP. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;98(4):e420–e426. doi:10.1111/aos.14321
Weinreb RN, et al. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma. JAMA. 2014;311(18):1901–1911. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.3192
World Health Organization. World report on vision. Geneva: WHO Press; 2020.